Feminism is Equality
“When a man gives his opinion, he’s a man. When a woman gives her opinion, she’s a b—-.” – Bette Davis
According to Merriam Webster, feminism is the doctrine advocating social, political, and all other rights of women equal to those of men. This may be the dictionary definition, but in modern society today, what exactly is feminism? In order to understand its presence in the country today, it is important to understand its origins.
American feminism is said to have three large historical waves, each uniquely important in shaping how modern feminism is today.
Wave #1: Women’s suffrage
In the late 1800s into the early 1900s, industrialization opened up a new opportunity for women to get outside of the home and into the “men’s world” that was America. Women began to work, and some advocated for the passage of what would be the 19th amendment, giving them the right to vote. The idea that women were fragile objects (very slowly) began to diminish.
Flappers began to appear, and so did birth control. Women began to have more control over their lives, but were often scorned by women who did participate in the traditional gender roles given to women at the time.
World Wars I and II also continued women’s push to leave traditional roles, as men went off to fight and women took their jobs. However, after men returned from war they also returned to work. But some women continued to work outside the home, and more held jobs than ever before.
Wave #2: 1960s through 1980s
This wave of feminism questioned gender roles and their place in American society. It also brought in women of color compared to the previous movement, which was mostly white, middle-class women. This wave critiqued the patriarchal society and the confines it brought down upon women. This wave often attacked products such as makeup and high heels that they claimed only further trapped women in the patriarchy.
Wave #3: The riot grrls of the 1990s
This wave of feminism encouraged women that even if they wore makeup and acted traditionally feminine, they were still strong and empowered women. They used words such as “b—-” and “slut” to challenge and destroy the labels that had been previously used to hurt women. This wave included women of all races, sexual orientations, and trans women.
To find out the extent of feminism in the PRHS community, I asked students and teachers what they thought that feminism truly was, and how feminists are typically perceived in our culture today.
“Feminism is equality. Not just for women, but for everyone,” says junior Danielle Nadeau. “Hopefully in the future, everyone will be a feminist.”
“Feminism is empowering women because the media tells them to be a lot of things, it’s our way of trying to be who we are instead of being the ‘bimbos’ that society tells us to be,” says Ashley Magee, also a junior.
PRHS Chemistry teacher Mr. Goguen says he definitely considers himself a feminist. “Feminism is equal rights. I’ve worked side by side with women all my life with situations that have equal pay, and equal responsibility.”
“Feminism is the radical notion that women are people,” says Ms. Ducolon. “Feminism in the future will disappear. I am worried that women are becoming more like they were in the 1950s. We have gone back in time to more traditional gender roles in many cases.”
This may be true, but the problem is not whether women in 2014 spend their days cooking and cleaning. It is whether they want to or not. Some aspects of modern society still encourage women to stay home and take care of children, and enforce the traditional gender roles. If a woman wants to be a stay at home mother, if she wants to cook dinner for her husband, if she wants to wear makeup and wants to be a traditional “housewife”, then by all means let her. But if a woman wants to become president, or wants to work on Wall Street or run a marathon or start her own construction company, than let her. If she wants to do both, than let her.
Women should not face shame whether they are traditionally “feminine” or not. But the stereotype of a feminist in today’s society is one that has grown out of proportion and it extremely inaccurate in describing true feminists.
Sophomore Aaron Arsenault says feminists are “people who worked really hard to gain women’s rights. But a feminist today is pro-females over males and against discrimination.”
According to junior Brianna Repke, a lot of people equate feminism with “not shaving your legs” instead of women’s rights.
Ms. Costello, PRHS librarian, is a proud feminist but acknowledges the harsh stigma around feminism. “Unfortunately, in American society today feminism means man-hater, of which I am not. I refer to feminism as the F-Word, because it is used with the same vile tones as the slang. Why am I a feminist? Because I don’t believe I should be beaten, raped, paid less for the same job, charged more at the dry cleaners, or asked if my husband will be co-signing a car loan all because I am a female.”
“There is a stereotype that feminists are extremely emotional and uncompromising, sometimes even hateful,” says junior Cooper Slack.
An anonymous girl added that “There’s a stigma around feminism. If a girl is too confident, they’re conceited and a b—-. But if they don’t stand up for themselves, they’re weak.”
“I feel that people assume feminists are snobby, self-centered people. However, that’s not the case,” said Megan Walsh, a junior.
“We are considered whiny, lesbian man-haters,” says Ms. Ducolon.
Some women who label themselves as “feminists” are, in fact, man-haters. These types of “feminists” act as if women are above men in all aspects of life, especially intelligence and morality. Feminism is supposed to be about equality. It seems that the true purpose of feminism has been degraded by a select few who take overly radical actions in order to destroy men and promote women. These actions have created and perpetuated the negative stereotype of feminists, when true feminists want women and men to be completely equal.
“Some ‘feminists’ want to kill off cis males and think they don’t want them to live. Many people believe that trans people can’t be feminists,” says senior Amber Richard.
The types of so-called feminists that Amber mentions are not really true feminists. Feminists do not attempt to destroy everything that the women’s movement has worked for. By making feminism seem as some sort of evil idea, people are dissuaded to join the cause for women’s rights. Girls don’t want to be stereotyped, and boys don’t want to associated with a movement that appears to want to destroy them.
There is a big difference- and a thin line- between a strong movement and a hateful movement.
True feminism should be promoted peacefully. Its real purpose is simply equality for all human beings. True feminists do not want to kill off men; they just want to be paid and treated equally without being labeled as a b—–.
Everyone interviewed was for women’s equality, but it was the stigmatism around feminism that prevented some from identifying themselves as feminists. It is time to change that, and make feminism a positive force in our school and in our society.
Henry • Aug 26, 2014 at 4:18 pm
“True feminism should be promoted peacefully. Its real purpose is simply equality for all human beings.”
If only that were the case. The problem is that there is an enormous gulf between the THEORY of what feminism is allegedly about (the dictionary definition) and the PRACTICE of what feminism really is and does in reality.
It is quite easy to demonstrate what I mean. You see, when your movement claims that it is simply fighting for equality with men, not special privileges above and beyond what men have, no silly, just equality, then your movement needs to explain why it still exists in the western world now that women have had all the same rights as men for quite some time now in addition to some female-specific special privileges on top of that which no man will ever have. Point me towards even ONE law in the U.S. for example which discriminates against women in favor of men. I hear crickets chirping. When you have already achieved all the same rights as men yet you still keep on playing the victim card to try to milk further gender-specific concessions out of society, guess what? You’re making it pretty damned obvious to anyone with more than 2 brain cells to rub together that equality isn’t nearly good enough for you, that you’re a female supremacist movement unconvincingly dressed up as one that’s “fighting for equality”. (For crying out loud, even the movement’s very NAME gives away its purpose. If it was fighting for equality it would be called egalitarianism or humanitarianism or something quite a bit less narrowly gender-specific.)
If feminism TRULY was about fighting for equality rather than being a one-sided gynocentric superiority movement then ask yourselves why it constantly pooh-poohs any problems or injustices that aren’t 100% exclusively about women. Ask yourself why it makes no effort at all to redress any of the imbalances that favor women over men.
For example, where is the feminist activity on the issue of women being sentenced to 60% less prison time for the same crimes as a man? Why isn’t feminism demanding that women be held to the same standard of adult responsibility as a man who committed the same crime? Why is your movement content with such an egregious disparity in sentencing? Oh yeah, because it is a disparity that favors women over men, whereas if the situation was reversed with men getting let off with 60% less prison time than a female you bet your ass it would be a feminist priority.
Where is feminism’s activism about the issue of women getting awarded custody in about 90% of child custody cases? To the extent that the woman would have to just about be a practicing prostitute or a heroin addict in order for the man to be given custody. Funny but this doesn’t seem to make it onto feminists’ radar either, I wonder why…
Why has feminism remained silent about the huge discrepancy in funding for male homeless shelters versus female homeless shelters? When the overwhelming majority of homeless people are men rather than women, why on earth should men’s shelters get short shrift compared to female shelters? This clearly isn’t a problem for your imaginary “patriarchial” government which routinely ignores men’s issues in favor of women’s issues so why isn’t feminism, the movement you never tire of telling us is not gynocentric but all-inclusive, fighting for equality not female supremacy, doing a damned thing to bring this to society’s attention? You can bet any amount of money if the situation was reversed with the homeless population being mostly female it would be a crisis of Biblical proportions, worthy of the government declaring a “war on homelessness” to solve it. Why is the feminist movement just as disinterested in this matter as the government?
Why is feminism content with men still having to pay alimony in 2014? Aren’t you the same ladies who constantly tell us how women are just as good as men, just as capable and just as independent? Then why the hell should a man have the responsibility of paying for the upkeep and lifestyle of his former spouse on an indefinite basis? Why did this issue only make it onto feminists’ radar (in Florida) when the infinitesimally small amount of women paying alimony to THEIR former spouses inched up a tiny bit while still remaining a mouse fart compared to men’s alimony payments? Where is feminism’s indignation that these supposedly liberated, independent women are entitled to being supported by a man that isn’t even living with them any longer? Why don’t you see this as an enormous insult and indignation? Oh yeah, because I suppose the convenience of getting a monthly check in the mail assuages your little feelings of shame and dependency, right? So long as it works in women’s favor instead of men’s it’s perfectly OK with the feminist movement.
Where is feminism’s concern with the issue of men committing suicide at rates astronomically higher than women? You know if the numbers were reversed there would be a colossal shitstorm until we got the numbers of women killing themselves back down to acceptable levels but yet with the numbers being what they are this, unsurprisingly, isn’t an issue feminists will lift a finger to work on.
And I have yet to hear a single feminist push for women having to register for the draft. Why does a man have to register at age 18 or else he isn’t entitled to any of the benefits of society, can’t vote, can’t collect Social Security when he’s old etc. yet no woman has to register for the draft in order to enjoy any of that? Why are feminists content to let women avoid adult responsibilities that men can never avoid? Oh yeah, because it isn’t a movement about equality at all but rather female supremacy, the same reason why the KKK never pushes for anything aside from matters that affect white people. As despicable as they are at least they’re honest enough to not pretend to be fighting for racial equality.
Or what about the biggest double standard on the face of the earth? By this I mean the elective abortion/mandatory child support issue. Let’s say a woman gets pregnant accidentally, neither her nor her partner intended for it to happen. If the man wants to be a daddy to that unexpected kid but the woman doesn’t want any parts of it she’s going to go to the abortion clinic and get that unborn human dismembered and sucked out of her uterus without having broken a single law in the process. That man will now be the proud daddy to a bloody little pile of severed arms and legs. But if the situation is reversed and the woman wants to keep the baby but the dad doesn’t want any parts of being a daddy? Tough tittie, he’s on the hook for 18 years of child support payments for a kid he will never see. The law simply doesn’t allow him to act like an irresponsible piece of shit at least not without facing the penalty of jail time for his irresponsibility. The law holds that man to his responsibility, forces him to act like a grown adult and take responsibility for his actions. Whereas the law makes no effort whatsoever to force the woman to act like an adult and take responsibility for HER actions, no, instead it lets her dance away from the consequences of her actions without a care in the world. When the man’s irresponsibility results in the woman not getting a monthly check in the mail and that’s illegal yet the woman’s irresponsibility results in the death of another human being (the unborn human) and yet THAT is LEGAL?? Are you effing kidding me?? This has to be the most horrific double standard the world has ever seen, yet I guarantee you that if anyone was to start pushing for ending mandatory child support payments or tying the continuance of legal abortion to the ending of mandatory child support it would be the feminitwits who would be leading the charge to make sure things remain as one-sided as they are now. When the woman is allowed to act like a magical sparkly princess with no more responsibility than a child even though her irresponsibility and immaturity results in a human being’s death and the man isn’t even allowed to skip out on child support payments for a kid he never sees, clearly this abortion/child support situation can be called nothing less than overt female supremacy. Not equality between the sexes. Not egalitarianism. Overt, in-your-face female supremacy and nothing less. Funny but I haven’t heard of a single feminist anywhere pushing for an end to elective abortion. Feminism seems perfectly content to let this terrible double standard remain in place and any comment made about ending elective abortion is immediately met with a lecture about how it would somehow be “oppressing women” to hold them to the same standard of responsibility a man is held to, how it would be “chaining them to the stove” or ensuring they are “barefoot and pregnant” or whatever other feminist propaganda bullshit they can come up with. Because this is one of the many double standards that feminists embrace, those which favor women over men. Another reason why few people aside from feminists themselves take feminists seriously.
So you want to “prove” your movement really is about equality and not female supremacy and special gender-specific privileges? Great, come out against elective abortion. Demand that it be abolished, demand that women are held to the same standard of responsibility that a man is held to, demand that women receive no preferential treatment in the court system etc. etc. Basically it comes down to a realization that not everything in life is a right or a privilege, that there are some things in adult life that are called “responsibilities”. If feminism wasn’t all about milking society for more benefits, more gender-specific set-asides, more quotas, more gynocentric advantages and actually grew the hell up enough to see that there are such things as RESPONSIBILITIES as well then maybe more people would take feminism seriously. As it stands right now only about 23% of American women identify as feminists meaning no less than 77% of women wouldn’t touch with a ten foot pole the movement that is supposed to be designed around their interests. That is a spectacular failure so amazing words can’t describe it. Perhaps women are getting tired of being constantly told they’re weak, helpless little victims who can’t do anything for themselves without a movement behind them to keep them pointed in the right direction and protected from this cruel world. I suspect your average woman is quite a bit stronger than that and doesn’t appreciate being talked down to. But whatever it is, your movement is dying and I say good riddance. Let it be replaced with something that doesn’t try to drive an unnecessary wedge between working class men and working class women. Let it be replaced with something far more mature, grown up, sensible and realistic. In other words let it be replaced with something that is GENUINELY about equal rights for the sexes.